$90,459
Where the money is
After 10 years the buyer's net worth from this decision is $193,192 — the home sold, costs paid, mortgage cleared, plus -$98,298 in their investment account. The renter's is $283,650, all of it invested. Buying does not pull ahead within the period modelled.
- Cash in at the start
- $103,500
- Buyer net worth after 10 years
- $193,192
- Renter net worth after 10 years
- $283,650
- Home value at exit
- $634,769
- Mortgage still owed at exit
- $305,194
- Selling costs at exit
- $38,086
- Buying is ahead from
- not within the period
What this is doing
- Tax treatment is deliberately not modelled — no mortgage interest deduction, no capital-gains exclusion on a primary residence. Both would usually favour buying, so the result here is, if anything, conservative about owning. Pretending to model them accurately without knowing your bracket would be worse than leaving them out and saying so.
- The investment return is applied to whichever household is banking money that month, at the same rate. Give one side a return and not the other and you can produce whatever answer you like.
- Every figure here is illustrative. It is generated from the numbers you typed using published rules, and it is not a rate quote, a pre-qualification, or an offer of credit.
The rule this page applies
The common rigged version banks the renter's surplus but never charges the renter when renting costs more, using a one-sided floor at zero. Here the surplus is signed: one side's gain is exactly the other side's loss, so the two investment accounts always sum to the shared starting cash.
Source: Symmetric net-wealth comparison
Questions people ask about this one
Why does renting look better than I expected?
Usually because the down payment is being invested rather than sitting in a wall. That opportunity cost is real and most lender calculators quietly omit it. Set the investment return to zero and watch the answer swing.
Why is there no tax deduction?
Because it depends on your bracket, whether you itemise at all, and the state you are in. A number invented for you would look precise and be wrong. It is left out, and the omission is stated.
What is the single most sensitive input?
Appreciation, then the holding period. Selling costs of 6% take several years of appreciation to recover, which is why short holds usually favour renting even in a rising market.
The rest of the bench
Monthly payment
Principal, interest, taxes, insurance, mortgage insurance and HOA — drawn as five separate threads, not folded into one number.
Amortisation
The full schedule, switchable month-wise and year-wise, with a running total and the crossover month called out.
Affordability
Income, debts and cash in, a defensible price out — and a plain statement of which of the three constraints is the one actually holding the number down.
Refinance
Costs divided by monthly saving is the answer most sites give, and it ignores the fact that a new 30-year term restarts the clock. Both numbers are shown here.
Extra payment
A recurring extra, a one-off lump sum, or both — against the interest they remove and the months they take off the end.
FHA MIP
The upfront premium, the annual premium, and the part almost every calculator gets wrong: whether it ever comes off.
VA purchase
The VA funding fee changes with the down payment and with whether it is your first use of the entitlement. Exempt borrowers pay none of it.
VA refinance
An IRRRL carries a 0.50% funding fee; a VA cash-out carries 2.15% or 3.30%. Both are shown against a true break-even.
Points
One point is one percent of the loan, paid today, for a lower rate for as long as you keep it. The only question that matters is how long that is.
HELOC
Interest-only while you draw, then a fully amortising payment that can be several times larger. Both are shown, because the second one is the surprise.
DSCR
Debt-service coverage divides the rent the property brings in by what the property costs to carry. Most lenders want 1.20 or better.
Fix & flip
Acquisition, rehab, points, interest, holding costs and selling costs against the after-repair value — with the cash you actually have to put in.